|
|
Re:LinkedIn v LIONS (1 viewing)
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:LinkedIn v LIONS
|
|
|
|
LinkedIn v LIONS 2007/06/14 04:30
|
Karma: 12  
|
|
Has anyone had any recent encounters with LinkedIn over their LION affiliation they would like to share?
I thought with the changing guard over at LinkedIn (read: Mgt shakeup) we would seem some "warming", but apparently not.
Christian Mayaud |
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:LinkedIn v LIONS 2007/09/16 06:32
|
Karma: 7  
|
|
I have noticed a change in there stance note below from Linkedin _________________________________________________________ Invitation Limits LinkedIn initially allows all users to send up to 3000 invitations. This limit is an automatic method to prevent accidental abuse and protect both senders and recipients.
The limit is in place only to prevent abuse, not to block invitations sent by careful inviters. LinkedIn encourages all users to connect to their trusted professional contacts, and to others who welcome connections with new contacts. Users who limit their invitations to these two groups have high invitation acceptance rates and LinkedIn will usually raise the limit for such inviters.
If you have encountered the limit, you can contact Customer Service to find out more about how the limit works, and how it can be raised. __________________________________________________________
Before it was always only with others you know.
I find this a refreshing change
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Related Items
|
|
|
Archive
|
Who's Online
We have 1 guest online
|
|